While this truth-teller strongly believes the Libertarian who served as a Republican Representative in the House Ron Paul is very wrong on many issues, there is one area in which he believes the elder Paul has it right. What follows is Mr. Paul speaking about our so-called "war on terror"...
Ron Paul: 9/11 "was blowback for decades of US intervention in the Middle East". And he was also correct when he said "the last thing we needed was the government's response: more wars, a stepped-up police and surveillance state, and drones". (Excerpt from a 9/11/2013 HuffPo article by Nick Wing). |
In regards to to Ron Paul on "blowback", the blogger Willis Hart (who calls himself a fiscally Conservative "small L Libertarian") wrote a commentary in which he expressed his disagreement with former Rep. Paul on this matter...
Willis Hart: For Mr. Paul or anybody to think that 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombings, and Benghazi wouldn't have happened had only our troops not been placed in Saudi Arabia for a spate is a little bit silly and naive in my estimation. (3/9/2014 AT 12:44pm). |
This view of Mr. Hart is, of course, complete bullplop. Although he does not go as far in insulting Mr. Paul as the delusional idiot Dennis Marks, who replies with the following...
Dennis Marks: I'm sure those like WD, with a "hate Americans first" attitude and who speaks with one voice alongside the terrorists on this will disagree. Strongly. Remember, he wanted Bin Laden to be turned over to a kangaroo court of fellow terrorists so he could get something between a slap on the wrist or a pat in the back... but not justice at all. (3/11/2014 AT 12:44pm). |
Yeah, his intention is to insult me with this vile lie, but if what Dennis says applies to me, then it assuredly applies to Mr. Paul as well. And, Marks is also fiscally Conservative in his thinking, same as Mr. Hart. But both of these morons have allowed their Islamophobia and thirst for vengeance to blind them to the anger our killing of Muslim innocents has seeded.
Illegal invasions and drone attacks have caused Muslims worldwide who wouldn't have joined up due to a desire for "jihad" and to convert infidels or kill them - joining up for REVENGE. That's blowback. People cautioning against it are NOT "speaking with one voice alongside the terrorists". Willis Hart is the naive one here. And Dennis Marks is an extremely sick lying sack of shit.
Dennis so depraved in his desire to KILL KILL KILL "the terrorists" that he eagerly slanders people concerned about the cycle of violence (and not at all on the side of the terrorists) with sick vile lies. And with no shame at all. Willis Hart should be embarrassed that his commentary elicited such vile filth. But it appears these two half-wits think - if not exactly - then very much alike.