The following is the definition of "neologism" according to the dictionary...
Dictionary.com, neologism: [1] a new word, meaning, usage, or phrase. [2] the introduction or use of new words or new senses of existing words. [3] a new doctrine, especially a new interpretation of sacred writings. [4] Psychiatry. a new word, often consisting of a combination of other words, that is understood only by the speaker: occurring most often in the speech of schizophrenics. |
It is the 4th definition that applies to Dennis Marks (AKA dmarks). A Dennisism *is* a neologism, or a word that is only understood by the speaker (in this case, Dennis). But that is NOT how Dennis defines "neologism".
A while back I used the word "truthy" in a conversation with Dennis. Dennis objected to the word, declaring it to be created by Stephen Colbert, and therefore new and a "neologism".
But, as it turns out, Dennis was wrong, as I pointed out to him originally, the term "truthiness" existed before Stephen Colbert used it. In regards to "truthiness", Wikipedia notes the following...
Linguist and OED consultant Benjamin Zimmer pointed out that the word "truthiness" already had a history in literature and appears in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as a derivation of truthy, and The Century Dictionary, both of which indicate it as rare or dialectal, and to be defined more straightforwardly as "truthfulness, faithfulness" (Source: Wikipedia/Truthiness. |
Therefore "truthy" is not a new word because it has had a dictionary entry for quite some time. And, therefore, it is also not a "neologism".
So, when Dennis claimed that "I avoid trendy neologisms", he must have been talking about "new words" created or used by others (or words he incorrectly perceives to be new, even when they are not). I say this because he surely comes up with a LOT of his own. Specifically I refer to the neologisms of Dennis I have documented here (using the term "Dennisism").
But I didn't know until now that the schizoid was redefining neologism as a putdown that only applies when people use words he doesn't like in arguments against him. "Truthy", in the example previously cited. But Dennis thinks coming up with his own new words and redefinitions is just fine. Although, in regards to the redefinitions, I'm just about positive he does not even know he's doing it. He actually believes that the dictionary agrees with him!
However, in regards to these invented words - the ones based on "canard" that I covered in my last Dennisism installment - those he has got to know aren't real.
Or, maybe he does think they're real. Apparently his buddy Lester Nation does, because when I pointed out that "canardo" is not a real word, Lester responded with the American Heritage Dictionary definition for "canard".
And, in response to that, the delusional Dennis imagined a victory (Lester proving to me that "canard" is a word, when we were actually talking about "canardo"), and voiced his agreement with Lester's imagined victory... exchange as follows...
rAtional nAtion: American Heritage Dictionary: ca·nard: Top Home >Library >Literature & Language >Dictionary (kə-närd') pronunciation n. An unfounded or false, deliberately misleading story. A short winglike control surface projecting from the fuselage of an aircraft, such as a space shuttle, mounted forward of the main wing and serving as a horizontal stabilizer. An aircraft whose horizontal stabilizing surfaces are forward of the main wing. [French, duck, canard, probably from the phrase vendre un canard à moitié, to sell half a duck, to swindle, from Old French quanart, duck, from caner, to cackle, of imitative origin.] Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/canard#ixzz38Qcj71sQ Well Dervish, looks like there is a reality here you wish not revealed eh? :-) (7/24/2014 06:44:00 PM EDT). dmarks: Enlightening, RN. I expect a lot more self-righteous whining in reaction to this... (7/24/2014 07:34:00 PM EDT). |
Obviously Dennis the dumb thinks Lester got the better of me with his response proving that canard is a word, even though I never said it wasn't. What I think we're actually dealing with here is a reality that Lester and Dennis "wish not revealed". Not even to themselves.
That reality? That they're both nuts. Enlightening? Not really, no. Those of us who aren't nuts realized this about Dennis and Lester long ago. This is nothing to whine about, however - self righteously or otherwise. It is simply a fact I have discerned by (perhaps foolishly) engaging these two in conversation.